4.75 of 5 stars
This is either an older model or we can or will no longer reorder this product from the manufacturer.
Don't give up – we have some other alternatives for you to choose from:
Lundhags - Askro Pro Pant - Walking trousers
.png){kind=icon}
At a glance
Material information & features
- Suitable for:
- Men
- Recommended use:
- trekking, hillwalking
- Main material:
- 88% polyamide, 12% polyurethane
- Inserts:
- 74% polyamide, 13% polyurethane, 13% aramid
- Material type:
- synthetic fibre, softshell
- Certifications:
- bluesign APPROVED
- Technology:
- schoeller dryskin, schoeller keprotec
- Fabric treatment:
- DWR treated
- Fabric properties:
- breathable, abrasion-resistant, fluorocarbon-free, quick-drying, highly wind-resistant, stretchy, water-repellent
- Closure:
- snap button
- Venting:
- ventilation zip
- Pockets:
- 2 zipped leg pockets, 2 zipped front pockets
- Weight:
- 460 g
- Reference size:
- medium size
- Fit:
- regular
- Extras:
- scuff guard, zipped leg cuffs, reinforced knees, adjustable leg cuffs, adjustable waistband, articulated knees
- Legal notice:
-
Please choose a sizePlease choose a colourPlease choose a variant
- Item No.:
- 010-0854
Reviews overview
Advantages
Disadvantages
Recommended use
What do you think about that?
This is what other customers say:
47% have found the reviews
by Andras helpful
First adult Lundhags trousers, I have ordered both the Makke and the Askro Pro in size 46.
Makke is slightly heavier than Askro Pro, 430g vs 400g in size 46 (both much lighter than my FJR Keb with 550g). Makke is totally a slim fit, Askro pro is slightly wider in the thigh but same below knee, almost a straight fit. Similar features, Askro Pro misses the boot lace hook, but has a much longer side zip and a different top-front pocket opening - makes it less useful, less deep than Makke.
Lundhags sizing is strange, waist in size 46 Makke is more than 1cm smaller than Askro Pro and much smaller than Authentic II. I could not wear the Authentic but Makke is almost perfect - you can dial in the waist.
I do like the Makke better, definitely a better fit to me - I am 170cm and 55kg - and I do not like the touch of the material used on the knee/butt of the Askro Pro - which is similar to the one on the cuff but not the same. However the same material makes Askro Pro slightly lighter even though it is more broad/wider in thighs.
-
Makke vs Askro Pro
-
Recommended use
Hiking Trekking
85% have found the reviews
by Ludwig helpful
The thread was edited on 10.11.23
-
Advantages
Good details Lightweight -
Disadvantages
Badly cut
66% have found the reviews
by Stephan helpful
-
Advantages
Good details -
Disadvantages
Badly cut
-
Advantages
Good cut Lightweight Waterproof Robust Good details Breathable Windproof -
Recommended use
Hiking All around Trekking Leisure Climbing
-
Advantages
Breathable Price / performance Lightweight Good details Good cut -
Recommended use
Trekking Hiking
Got two pairs of these and also two pairs of the Lundhags Makke best lightweight trousers I have ever owned.
Nice and comfortable and very robust.
-
Advantages
Good cut Windproof Price / performance Lightweight Breathable Good details Robust -
Recommended use
Climbing Camping Travel Expedition Hiking Trekking Leisure
-
Advantages
Good details Robust -
Recommended use
Hiking Trekking
-
Advantages
Good details Lightweight -
Recommended use
Leisure Hiking
-
Advantages
Good details Lightweight Good cut -
Recommended use
Leisure Hiking
-
Advantages
Robust Lightweight Good details Price / performance Windproof Good cut Breathable -
Recommended use
Hiking Leisure Expedition Trekking All around Winter hiking
There are 27 more threads!